4 min read
Rather than asking “Which country is better?”, students increasingly ask a more practical question:
Which system actually works for students’ lives, finances, and futures—and how can it be improved?
This article examines student experience in Ireland and France, not as competitors, but as complementary case studies in problem-solving. Each system succeeds where the other struggles. From affordability to bureaucracy, from industry access to cultural integration, students can clearly see what needs reform—and where inspiration should come from.
The Irish Student POV: Opportunity with a High Cost
Strengths of the Irish Model
From a student perspective, Ireland’s higher education system is market-oriented, outward-looking, and industry-linked. Irish universities have aligned themselves closely with multinational employers, especially in technology, finance, pharmaceuticals, and AI. For students—particularly international students—this translates into clear post-study work pathways and comparatively transparent visa options.
Key advantages students consistently identify include:
- English as the primary academic language, removing barriers to participation and employability
- Strong campus culture, with societies, clubs, and student unions playing a central social role
- Practical curricula, especially in STEM, business, and applied sciences
- Accessible student support services, including counselling, disability support, and career offices
From a problem-solving standpoint, Ireland excels at answering one crucial student question:
“What happens after I graduate?”
Structural Problems Students Face
However, Irish students—domestic and international alike—face an increasingly severe contradiction: opportunity exists, but affordability does not.
Major pain points include:
- Extremely high rent, especially in Dublin, Cork, and Galway
- Chronic student accommodation shortages, forcing students into long commutes or insecure housing
- High tuition fees for non-EU students, with limited transparency on value for money
- Over-reliance on part-time work, which negatively affects academic performance
For SIOS, this is not merely a cost-of-living issue; it is a systemic access problem. When education becomes financially survivable only for those with external support, social mobility collapses.
The French Student POV: Accessibility with Administrative Weight
Strengths of the French Model
France approaches higher education from a fundamentally different philosophy: education as a public good, not a market product. For students, this is immediately visible in cost structures.
Core strengths include:
- Low tuition fees at public universities, even for international students
- Strong state subsidies, including housing assistance (CAF), transport discounts, and meals
- Deep academic tradition, especially in humanities, mathematics, philosophy, and theoretical sciences
- Cultural integration, with student life embedded in cities rather than isolated campuses
For many students, France answers a different key question better than Ireland:
“Can I afford to be a student without financial anxiety?”
Where the System Breaks Down
Yet affordability alone does not equal accessibility. From a student POV, France’s greatest weakness is institutional complexity.
Common challenges include:
- Heavy bureaucracy, particularly around visas, residency, and social benefits
- Language barriers, even within “English-taught” programs
- Limited structured career support, especially for non-elite universities
- Rigid academic structures, with less flexibility for interdisciplinary or applied learning
Students often report feeling administratively invisible—a number in a system rather than an individual supported through their academic journey.
Problem-Solving Lens: What Ireland Can Learn from France
From a SIOS problem-solving framework, Ireland’s most urgent reforms are not academic, but structural.
1. Treat Student Housing as Infrastructure, Not Investment
France demonstrates that state intervention in student housing works. Ireland’s market-led housing approach has failed students. Purpose-built accommodation must be treated like transport or healthcare—essential infrastructure tied to national productivity.
2. Normalize Universal Student Supports
Housing aid, transport subsidies, and affordable meals reduce student stress and dropout rates. These supports are not “handouts”; they are productivity multipliers.
3. Reduce Over-Financialisation of Education
Ireland’s heavy reliance on international tuition revenue creates systemic risk and ethical tension. France shows that public investment stabilises student access over time.
What France Can Learn from Ireland
While France wins on affordability, Ireland clearly outperforms in student-to-employment transition.
1. Integrate Industry into Curriculum Design
Irish universities actively involve employers in shaping programs. France’s strong theoretical base would benefit from structured applied pathways, especially outside elite grandes écoles.
2. Simplify Administrative Systems for Students
Ireland’s relatively streamlined visa and work-permission processes highlight how bureaucracy directly affects student wellbeing and retention.
3. Invest in Career Services as Core Infrastructure
Career offices in Ireland are not optional extras—they are central. French universities must treat employability support as a student right, not a privilege.
International Students: The Ultimate Stress Test
For international students, these contrasts become sharper.
- Ireland offers clarity, work access, and migration pathways, but at high financial risk
- France offers affordability and cultural depth, but limited guidance through complex systems
From a SIOS standpoint, the ideal European model does not yet exist. But its components are visible across both systems.
Toward a Hybrid Student-Centred Model
The future of European higher education should not be framed as Ireland versus France, but Ireland plus France.
A student-first system would combine:
- France’s affordability and public commitment
- Ireland’s employability focus and student services
- Clear migration and post-study pathways
- Housing treated as a public responsibility
- Education designed for both citizenship and careers
Conclusion: Students Are Not the Problem—Systems Are
From the Students Ireland OS perspective, students are already doing the adapting: working longer hours, learning new languages, navigating foreign bureaucracies, and managing financial precarity. The real question is whether education systems will adapt to students, rather than expecting students to survive structural failure.
Ireland and France both hold pieces of the solution. The challenge—and opportunity—for policymakers is to connect them.
If Europe wants globally competitive graduates, socially mobile citizens, and sustainable migration systems, then student experience must move from the margins to the centre of reform.
For SIOS, this is not ideology.
It is problem-solving, grounded in student reality.
